The Courts and Tribunals Bill would remove a rule, in place since 2014, that family courts start from the view that each parent's involvement is good for a child. Committee stage begins on 10 November.
By Plumbline staff27 October 2026 · 2 min read
Photo: Kristoffer Trolle / CC BY 2.0The Government’s Courts and Tribunals Bill has its second reading in the House of Lords today, Tuesday 27 October, moved by justice minister Lord Lemos. It has already passed the Commons. Alongside changes to the criminal courts, the bill would amend section 1 of the Children Act 1989 to remove “the presumption relating to the involvement of parents in the life of a child”.
The presumption was added by the Children and Families Act 2014. When a family court decides arrangements for a child after separation, it must presume that the involvement of each parent will further the child’s welfare, unless there is evidence otherwise.
Table of Contents
ToggleMinisters first announced the repeal in October 2025. Confirming in March that it would be done through this bill, the Ministry of Justice said “evidence shows that the current process can leave children at risk of harm”. Without the presumption, it said, courts would carry out “an open-minded inquiry into what is in a child’s best interests”, and could still limit a parent to supervised or written contact, or end contact altogether. Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy said: “we are repealing the presumption of parental involvement through the Courts and Tribunal Bill.”
The change follows a long campaign by Claire Throssell, whose sons Jack and Paul were killed by their abusive father in 2014 during contact that a family court had allowed. A Ministry of Justice review published in October 2025, covering 32 academic papers and 245 court judgments, found that where there was no risk of harm, the involvement of both parents “generally had a positive impact on child welfare”. It also found that courts often ordered direct contact even where there were signs of high risk.
Critics of repeal, including some family lawyers, argue that it sets aside strong evidence that children do better with both parents involved, and risks non-resident parents, most often fathers, being treated as less important. They point to a child’s right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and to a relationship with both parents under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Peers will be able to table amendments at committee stage, which begins on Tuesday 10 November, with a second day on 16 November.
If peers change the bill, it returns to the Commons. Find your MP and send a letter in your own words.
Dear {mp}, I'm writing as your constituent about the Courts and Tribunals Bill, which would remove the presumption that each parent's involvement in a child's life furthers the child's welfare. Children must be protected from abusive parents, and courts can already restrict contact where there is a risk of harm. But for most children, having both parents involved after separation is good for them, and the law should continue to say so. I ask you to support amendments that protect children from harm while keeping the presumption in place. Please let me know your view. Yours sincerely, [Your name] [Your full address and postcode]The Courts and Tribunals Bill and the presumption of parental involvementYour postcode is only used to find your MP. We don't store it.
Father, we pray for children caught up in family breakdown, and for parents who long to be part of their children's lives. Protect every child from harm, and give peers and judges wisdom to do what is truly best for them. Amen.
House of Lords
The Plumbline has no paywall and no big backers. If this report helped you, please support independent reporting on life, family, faith and freedom.
Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.